Lest someone believe that the software system for USA's affordable healthcare law exchange implementation is the only game in town, Hunky Husband guided me to this article (excerpt, below). He and I have recently been discussing how few people understand the difficulties of getting complicated systems to work and the length of time that is required for appropriate testing.
WASHINGTON (AP) — After a decade of work and billions of dollars spent, the
modernization of the U.S. air traffic control system is in trouble. The
ambitious and complex technology program dubbed NextGen has encountered
unforeseen difficulties at almost every turn.
The program was promoted as a way to accommodate an anticipated surge in air
travel, reduce fuel consumption and improve safety and efficiency. By shifting
from radar-based navigation and radio communications — technologies rooted in
the first half of the 20th century — to satellite-based navigation and digital
communications, it would handle three times as many planes by 2025, the Federal
Aviation Administration promised.
Planes would fly directly to their destinations using GPS technology instead of following indirect routes to stay within the range of ground stations. They would continually broadcast their exact positions, not only to air traffic controllers, but to other similarly equipped aircraft. For the first time, pilots would be able to see on cockpit displays where they were in relation to other planes. That would enable planes to safely fly closer together, and even shift some of the responsibility for maintaining a safe separation of planes from controllers to pilots. [That statement may be misleading to non-pilots! CC]
But almost nothing has happened as FAA officials anticipated.
Increasing capacity is no longer as urgent as it once seemed. The 1 billion passengers a year the FAA predicted by 2014 has now been shoved back to 2027. Air traffic operations - takeoffs, landings and other procedures - are down 26 percent from their peak in 2000, although chronic congestion at some large airports can slow flights across the country.
Difficulties have cropped up nearly everywhere, from new landing procedures that were impossible for some planes to fly to aircraft-tracking software that misidentified planes. Key initiatives are experiencing delays and are at risk of cost overruns. And the agency still lacks "an executable plan" for bringing NextGen fully online, according to a government watchdog.
"In the early stages, the message seemed to be that NextGen implementation was going to be pretty easy: You're going to flip a switch, you're going to get NextGen, we're going to get capacity gains," said Christopher Oswald, vice president for safety and regulatory affairs at Airports Council International-North America. "It wasn't realistically presented."
Some airline officials, frustrated that they haven't seen promised money-saving benefits, say they want better results before they spend more to equip planes to use NextGen, a step vital to its success.
Lawmakers, too, are frustrated. NextGen has enjoyed broad bipartisan support in Congress, but with the government facing another round of automatic spending cuts, supporters fear the program will be increasingly starved for money.
....
Recent Comments